Handling Exceptions with Domains in Node.js
16 May 2015Safely responding to error scenarios can be difficult at times. Changing the context of when exceptions are raised amplifies and complicates the problem somewhat.
In today’s post, I’m going to walk through some simple usage of the Domain module in Node.js and how it can be applied in scenarios to make your software more fault tolerant overall.
What are Domains?
The description of a domain
given in the API documentation sums it up best, I think:
Domains provide a way to handle multiple different IO operations as a single group. If any of the event emitters or callbacks registered to a domain emit an
error
event, or throw an error, then the domain object will be notified, rather than losing the context of the error in theprocess.on('uncaughtException')
handler, or causing the program to exit immediately with an error code.
Going off the information in my previous post about eventing, the error
events generated by EventEmitter
objects are going to be registered inside of the domain
allowing us a greater level of control and visibility in exception cases, no matter the context.
A simple example
In this example, we’ll create a generic EventEmitter
and domain
and we’ll see how the chain of error handling occurs:
We’ve created the domain d1
and have attached an error handler to it. We’ve also created our EventEmitter
called emitter
and attached a handler to it as well. The following code now starts to raise errors:
As the comments read, we have our error being reported in different places as objects get detached from one another. The output of which looks like this:
Our exceptions are reported to our attached handler on emitter
first. Once it’s been removed as a handler, the error is then reported to the domain d1
. Once the domain has no knowledge of emitter
, the last error manifests as an unhandled error.
Implicit and Explicit Binding
An interesting point made in the documentation is about implicit and explicit binding.
If domains are in use, then all new EventEmitter objects (including Stream objects, requests, responses, etc.) will be implicitly bound to the active domain at the time of their creation.
So, if we’re in a scenario where we’re creating EventEmitter
objects inside of the domain
, there’s no need to add them using the add
function.
In a lot of cases you aren’t afforded this luxury. The objects that you want to observe are created at a higher scope or just generally before the domain is constructed; in these cases you need to use the add
function.
A little more RealWorld™
The api documentation contains a great example usage of the domain
module in conjunction with the cluster
model. It illustrates the ability to give your application a higher level of resilience against errors thrown so that not all of your uses are effected by a single rogue request.
The following started as an excerpt from the aforementioned documentation, but has been adapted for this article:
The run
method at the end is really the error pillow for our request handler. We don’t really know what went wrong in unhandled exception cases, all we know is that “something” went wrong. Safest course of action in these conditions is to shut down the failing server and start again.
Pretty neat.